How HR Can Do Better

Zoie Newman • June 1, 2026

Most people have a story about HR, and often that story includes disappointment. Through layoffs, FMLA requests, harassment, difficult managers, and other workplace challenges, HR is meant to support employees. It should be a resource for people during some of the hardest moments, because we do not leave our personal experiences at the door when we come to work. But in many modern workplaces, that role has changed. HR is often feared, avoided, and burdened by a negative reputation. So how did we get here, and how can we do better?


HR emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when organizations began to recognize that employee well-being was closely connected to productivity during the industrial revolution. Over time, the field gained momentum through labor strikes in the early 1900s, and ideas influenced by the Hawthorne Studies which changed our understanding of management theory. By the 1950s and 1960s, HR had become more established. Given its roots in improving working conditions, the question is: how do we return HR to that purpose?


Recently, I’ve been reading Get It in Writing by Ryan Stygar, known online as Attorney Ryan. As someone starting a new HR business, I felt it was essential to add this perspective to my knowledge base and deepen my understanding of labor law. In the book, Stygar explains in detail what employees need to know about their rights at work. But after reading case study after case study—and seeing HR repeatedly framed as a form of “risk management” for companies—I began to question whether that description is accurate. I’ve had my own painful experiences with HR. In some cases, HR failed to protect me from harassment, bullying, and a hostile work environment until I eventually quit. I was often told that dealing with unacceptable behavior was simply part of my job. What stands out most to me is that, in trying to protect themselves, HR departments often do the opposite of effective risk management. Too often, they break the law instead, exposing their organizations to lawsuits, investigations, and damage to their own professional credibility.


The truth is that a people-centered approach to HR is risk management. When organizations put the human experience at the center of how they lead and employ people, they reduce risk by addressing needs early and building healthier workplaces. Prioritizing people over short-term business interests is not a liability—it is one of the strongest protections an organization can have.


So how can HR do better? It starts with returning to its original purpose: protecting people by creating safer, fairer, and more accountable workplaces. That means addressing harm early, responding to employee concerns with integrity, and recognizing that compliance alone is not enough. HR must be willing to challenge ineffective leadership, confront patterns of mistreatment, and advocate for systems that support both dignity and trust. Also, actively know the boundaries of the law, so you don’t go outside of it. If the field wants to rebuild credibility, it must stop asking employees to fear it and start giving them a reason to believe in it. For HR professionals, leaders, and organizations alike, the call is clear: build systems that protect people, listen before harm escalates, and treat trust as a responsibility—not a talking point.


Share

The Sage Source: Insights in HR & Development

The Difference Between Conflict Resolution & De-escalation

By Zoie Newman • May 4, 2026
Have you ever wondered if your team needs conflict resolution skills, de-escalation training, or perhaps both? What separates these two approaches? People often use the terms interchangeably, but conflict resolution and de-escalation are distinct skill sets to use at different stages of conflict. It can be crucial to deploy the right tools at the right time. When trying to repair a relationship when the emotions aren’t dealt with first, you can unintentionally escalate a conflict. Let’s break down the differences between de-escalation and conflict resolution and when to use both. What is De-escalation? Think of conflict resolution and de-escalation as tools in a toolbox: de-escalation is like a fire extinguisher, used to quickly cool down heated emotions and prevent the situation from getting out of control. Heated moments can come in waves, and deploying de-escalation can often happen repeatedly while we wait for others to processes the conflict. The most important part of de-escalation is to first learn to de-escalate yourself. Our own ability to self-regulate is crucial when it comes to practicing de-escalation. When we can self-regulate, we’re not as easily influenced to contribute to escalation. When self-regulated we can lean into the knowledge that we are all co-regulating with on another all the time and knowing this gives us the power to guide ourselves and those we’re in conflict with into a calmer state. De-escalation is both a verbal and nonverbal process, however our nonverbal cues are dominate and more important when trying to de-escalate someone. When someone is emotionally hijacked or in flight or fight, they are not listening but observing. Our nonverbal cues send the message of safety, and when that is backed by empathetic statements in a nonthreatening tone, a person can start to engage with their thinking brain and trust that others regard their concerns as highly as they do. To lean into co-regulation and cue de-escalation, stand openly and non-threateningly, maintain distance, keep a neutral expression and open palms, and soften your gaze, and head nodding to show listening and engagement. Lean in and mirror some cues to show empathy. Use a quiet, low voice for calm. What is Conflict Resolution? Conflict resolution, meanwhile, is like a set of blueprints and construction tools; once the immediate flames are out, you use these to investigate, rebuild understanding, and find lasting solutions. Conflict resolution consists of getting curious about what each party needs from resolution. When we focus on needs and move away from blame, judgement and criticism of the conflict we can get to the root of why we are in conflict. This is where our verbal communication starts to take center stage. When we articulate our own values and needs and ask the right questions and lean into the relationship building part of our preferred communication style we can resolve conflict in a health manner. Moving into conflict resolution and out of de-escalation, we engage in whole body listening, this means listening to all the verbal and nonverbal communication going on in the conflict. It is about reframing what you heard to clarify understanding, and finding common ground where understanding, adaption and resolution take place. Each approach plays a vital role, while de-escalation and conflict resolution are often mentioned together, each serves a unique purpose in managing workplace tension. De-escalation provides the immediate calm needed to create a safe environment, allowing everyone involved to regain composure. Only then can true conflict resolution begin, focusing on understanding core needs, values, and building lasting solutions. By equipping ourselves and our teams with both skill sets, we not only prevent unnecessary escalation but also pave the way for genuine connection and growth. Ultimately, mastering both approaches empowers us to turn moments of discord into opportunities for deeper trust, collaboration, and a healthier workplace culture.

Healthy Conflict Across Generations

By Zoie Newman • April 6, 2026
Generational differences are becoming an increasingly important topic in today’s workplace, influencing communication, teamwork, and mutual respect. The four central generations are experiencing significant social, emotional, and technological divides, which can reduce understanding and trust and lead to more conflict. This has created greater polarization, as people seek safety with peers close to their age rather than embracing opportunities for growth and a richer career through dynamic relationships across all generations. So how can we help build sturdier relationships, and reform trust with those of different ages? Like so many, I have certainly found myself in miscommunications and conflict fueled by generational differences. Having worked in healthcare as my first career, these generational differences can be stark, not only in the way incoming medical professionals are educated but also in the dynamics of staff and clinicians and most certainty in the communication from clinician to patient. However, generational conflict expands to all industries, and likely, you can relate to comments such as “back in my day”, “it’s just how the world works”, “they just want to work from home” that promote more of a cliché around generations than get to the heart of our differences and how they might benefit us instead of hinder us. In fact, most of the conflict that is fueled by our age diversity comes from overgeneralization and assumptions that we have made about one another that justifies our frustrations in tense moments. As a leading conversation, and an area I have found most mangers want greater support in, here are some ways we can make positive change. Embrace a needs-based communication style Coined by Dr. Marshall Rosenburg, needs based communication (or more commonly known as nonviolent communication) is a style of communication that de-escalates our language and focuses more on meeting the needs and values of a person. Our language can get us really bogged down in exaggeration, who deserves what, comparisons and judgments, all of which are breading grounds for our unconscious biases. If we can catch ourselves doing this and become aware of it, we can bring ourselves back to the human experience of others we are in conflict with. Next time you find yourself in a misunderstanding, conflict or difficult discussion again ask yourself these questions: What feelings do I notice being present? What needs am I trying to meet for myself? What needs do I think they are trying to meet? Are they the same as mine? What values do I hold that can help me navigate this? Understanding that individuals interact primarily to fulfill their needs—rather than to be confrontational—can fundamentally change how we view generational differences. Our shifting needs and circumstances, influenced by age and life experiences, shape our behaviors at work. By recognizing that each generation approaches its needs in unique ways, we open opportunities for building stronger, more innovative teams.  Embrace these diverse perspectives with openness and communicate around your needs, it will allow you to let go of judgement. Lean into shared values A place we can find commonality and maintain a needs-based approach to our communication is through values. Individuals all have a set of core values they live by, but what we don’t always realize is that we often share a lot of our value systems, we just have different ways of defining and honoring those values. Megan Gerhardt, in her book Gentelligence, goes on to identify that across age diversity we have four shared values in the workplace. These values are, Respect, Autonomy, Connection, Competency. No matter where you land on the generational spectrum, likely, these resonate with you, and it shows that we have more in common with one another than not. We all have the unique desire to be seen as skilled and valued for these skills as well as to experience both collaboration and freedom in our work. Knowing what shared values we may have across our generations, doesn’t however mean that hard work doesn’t have to happen to get to know one another. Our shared values are a foundational place to learn from, and when we incorporate that we collectively want to experience respect, autonomy, connection, and competency in the workplace we can start to get curious. However, it is still up to you to ask the open-ended questions that bring greater understanding and to check your own assumptions that might lead to unhealthy conflict. Fostering healthy conflict across generations starts with recognizing both our shared values and the unique needs that shape how we communicate and work together. By embracing needs-based communication, we reduce assumptions and judgments, allowing us to connect more authentically and build trust. Leaning into common values like respect, autonomy, connection, and competency, we create a foundation for positive change, regardless of age differences. While generational divides may fuel misunderstandings, curiosity and openness help us move beyond stereotypes and toward stronger, more collaborative workplaces. Ultimately, when we approach conflict with empathy and flexibility, we not only bridge generational gaps but also enrich our professional relationships and team dynamics.